Drupal has long supported both MySQL and PostgreSQL as database backends. The vast majority of Drupal users run it on MySQL though. Support for PostgreSQL in Drupal has suffered from non-contiguous maintainership, with someone taking it for a year, then disappearing, then someone else comes by and takes it up, ...etc.
There has even been concerns among core developers about PostgreSQL holding back patches that work fine in MySQL.
Benchmark setup
For the hardware, I used my development server, which is an AMD64 X2 4400+ dual core running at 2.2 GHz, with 2 GB of RAM.
This server runs Ubuntu Server 7.04 Fesity Fawn x86_64.
MySQL is 5.0.38, and PostgreSQL is 8.2.5, which are what comes with this distro version. PHP is 5.2.1, with APC 3.015 installed and configured.
Drupal setup
Drupal is the latest 5.x DRUPAL-5 tagged version from the repository.
The setup was a multisite install, so both sites are running from the same code base. One was configured for MySQL and one for PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL configuration
Setting up a PostgreSQL database took some digging, but once the steps are figured out, they are fairly simple.
First, PostgreSQL would not start, and complains about the SSL certificate.
FATAL: could not load private key file 'server.key': key values mismatch
This is caused by the default SSL certficate delivered with Ubuntu is not a valid one. To solve this, just edit /etc/postgresql/8.2/main/postgresql.conf and comment out the line that says ssl = true. Now PostgreSQL will start.
No other changes from the default settings provided by Ubuntu are made.
Creating a PostgreSQL user and database
The steps to create a database in PostgreSQL are documented in the INSTALL.pgsql.txt that comes with Drupal.
However, I used a slightly different approach, with the same end result.
For creating a user and database, assuming we want a user called username and a password of password123, you do the following in a shell:
$ sudo bash # su - postgres $ createuser -DRS username $ createdb -O username drupal $ psql ALTER USER USERNAME WITH UNENCRYPTED PASSWORD 'password123';
Once the database is created, you just stick the following link in settings.php:
$db_url = 'pgsql://username:password123@localhost/drupal';
Then, you visit install.php so Drupal will create the tables for you in the database. Of course, you can use install.php and enter the data as well, which is easier for most users.
MySQL configuration
The default configuration supplied with Ubuntu was used. This has the query cache turned on by default. All the tables are MyISAM.
Running the benchmarks
The benchmark consisted of running two benchmarks using ab on each virtual host.
One benchmark was for a concurrency of 1:
ab -c1 -n1000 http://mysql.example.com/
The other was with a concurrency of 5:
ab -c5 -n1000 http://mysql.example.com/
Benchmarking methodology
For setting up data for this test, the devel module's generate functionality was used to create content types pages and stories, with 2000 nodes and 2000 comments.
MySQL results
MySQL with Devel module
When hitting the front page of the site, the MySQL site shows this:
Page execution time was 63.89 ms. Executed 98 queries in 15.07 milliseconds.
MySQL with concurrency of 1
The results are 18.2 requests per second.
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 Server Hostname: mysql Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 14054 bytes Concurrency Level: 1 Time taken for tests: 54.855844 seconds Complete requests: 1000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 14580000 bytes HTML transferred: 14054000 bytes Requests per second: 18.23 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 54.856 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 54.856 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 259.55 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 51 54 6.9 54 267 Waiting: 49 52 6.7 52 259 Total: 51 54 6.9 54 267 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 54 66% 55 75% 55 80% 55 90% 55 95% 55 98% 55 99% 55 100% 267 (longest request)
MySQL with concurrency of 5
The results are 32.8 requests per second.
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 Server Hostname: mysql Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 14054 bytes Concurrency Level: 5 Time taken for tests: 30.454853 seconds Complete requests: 1000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 14580000 bytes HTML transferred: 14054000 bytes Requests per second: 32.84 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 152.274 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 30.455 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 467.51 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 1 Processing: 54 151 143.4 148 3553 Waiting: 52 149 143.2 145 3551 Total: 54 151 143.4 148 3553 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 148 66% 166 75% 178 80% 186 90% 203 95% 221 98% 247 99% 328 100% 3553 (longest request)
PostgreSQL results
PostgreSQL with Devel module
When hitting the front page of the site, the PostgreSQL site shows this:
Devel shows: Page execution time was 130.44 ms. Executed 99 queries in 67.81 milliseconds.
This is more than the 68 ms taken by MySQL. The time taken for queries is 68 ms, as opposed to just 15 ms by MySQL.
PostgreSQL with concurrency of 1
For a concurrency of 1, PostgreSQL does 10.7 requests per second.
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 Server Hostname: postgres Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 14188 bytes Concurrency Level: 1 Time taken for tests: 92.395355 seconds Complete requests: 1000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 14715000 bytes HTML transferred: 14188000 bytes Requests per second: 10.82 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 92.395 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 92.395 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 155.53 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 89 91 7.7 90 288 Waiting: 87 89 7.5 88 278 Total: 89 91 7.7 90 288 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 90 66% 90 75% 91 80% 91 90% 95 95% 105 98% 108 99% 110 100% 288 (longest request)
PostgreSQL with concurrency of 5
For a concurrency of 5, PostgreSQL can do 12.8 requests per second.
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 Server Hostname: postgresql Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 14188 bytes Concurrency Level: 5 Time taken for tests: 59.679424 seconds Complete requests: 1000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 14715000 bytes HTML transferred: 14188000 bytes Requests per second: 16.76 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 298.397 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 59.679 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 240.79 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 117 297 122.6 280 1035 Waiting: 114 295 122.6 278 1033 Total: 117 297 122.6 280 1035 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 280 66% 326 75% 358 80% 379 90% 447 95% 506 98% 642 99% 721 100% 1035 (longest request)
Summary
The following table shows a summary of the results in a concise form.
Database | MySQL | PostgreSQL |
Total time taken for front page (milliseconds) | 63.89 | 130.44 |
Time for front page queries (milliseconds) | 15.07 | 67.81 |
Concurrency of 1 (requests per second) | 18.23 | 10.82 |
Concurrency of 5 (requests per second) | 32.84 | 16.76 |
MySQL's query cache
MySQL's query cache makes its performance better. This can be demonstrated by restarting MySQL, then visiting the home page of the site and seeing the query time in devel's output. However this is not as marked as what PostgreSQL takes.
Right after MySQL starts (no queries cached yet):
Page execution time was 92.74 ms. Executed 98 queries in 30.04 milliseconds.
Subsequent access (query cache kicks in).
Page execution time was 63.61 ms. Executed 98 queries in 10.38 milliseconds.
Conclusion
The definite conclusion from these benchmarks is that out of the box, MySQL is configured to run faster than PostgreSQL.
Future considerations
PostgreSQL can probably be made better by further tuning. I am willing to repeat these benchmarks if the PostgreSQL community are willing to guide me with what parameters need to change in order to make its performance better. Please comment below if you have info on this.
Updates
1. I attached the configuration files used for both MySQL and PostgreSQL for anyone who wants to share configuration options that would tune performance further.
2. You can also see a more tweaked MySQL MyISAM configuration file for large web sites for reference (not used for this benchmark).
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
postgresql-configuration.txt | 508 bytes |
mysql-configuration.txt | 741 bytes |
Comments
Visitor (not verified)
InnoDB
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 12:53I'm no Postgresql expert but from my understanding this is not the comparison typically talked about. MyISAM is faster at a functionality cost.
What I usually read about in the comparison is InnoDB vs. Postgresql. These two setups share from of the same functionality such as row level locking rather than table level locking. This is the use case I'm most interested in. From my basic understanding, this is the more appropriate test case.
Visitor (not verified)
localhost?
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 13:49Did you run these tests _on_ the server? When you get a higher # of requests/s for higher concurrency settings, it might indicate that your network connection is the limiting factor.
Also, I don't see the value of out-of-the-box performance; it's the tweaked performance that matters.
Khalid
Yes and no
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 14:24Yes, the tests were run on the server (i.e. ab on the same server that runs Drupal and the database). So, network is not an issue here.
As for out of the box experience, it is very important for the average user. They don't have the knowledge, time or money to tweak a system to squeeze the maximum performance.
I am looking for ways to improve PostgreSQL, so anyone with knowledge on how to do that is welcome to share configuration options to do so.
--
2bits -- Drupal and Backdrop CMS consulting
Visitor (not verified)
This could say more about Drupal and/or PHP than MySQL or PG
Thu, 2008/01/03 - 00:53I have deployed Drupal 5x with MySQL and PostgreSQL and the latter has always felt faster. Admittedly, this was only an impression based upon using the site rather than running an artificial benchmark on it. However, I have always ended up using MySQL, despite how much I dislike that product, with Drupal only because support for PostgreSQL is spotty at best for anything but core modules. The results you obtained may have more to do with poor support of PostgreSQL by PHP and/or Drupal than MySQL's supposed superiourity.
Visitor (not verified)
agreed - out of the box is of little value
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 22:12i agree with heine and others. it is simply not useful for most of your readers to compare with out of the box configurations. people who need high performance can afford to buy a book and read web sites like this for configuration tips. your test is valid, it is just not useful. my .02.
Khalid
Hold on ...
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 23:37Well, not all sites can afford tuning. Forget the top 10 Drupal sites, and those with several hundred thousands of page views a day. The vast majority of sites fall into this second tier (dedicated and VPS ones, and even shared hosting ones that choose PostgreSQL).
Anyway, I am working with Bill Moran to tune PostgreSQL further. We tried increased the shared_buffers to 200M. The size of the database is 100M, but that still did not help.
Stay tuned, it is not over yet.
--
2bits -- Drupal and Backdrop CMS consulting
Visitor (not verified)
Any update
Fri, 2007/12/28 - 17:18Hi Khalid,
Was wondering if there was any more tunning done on the PostgreSQL db and did it help to bring it inline with the speed of MySQL.
I'm at a point of selecting a db for my web app, so this info would be good to have. I have read many articles and blog entries and they all seem to point that the newer version of PostgreSQL is just as fast as MySQL.
If there is an update to your benchmark, please post it.
Thanks,
Amin
Visitor (not verified)
Tests like this will always
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 15:10Tests like this will always show the same: mysql is faster. And it is, single user, single processor. The point however is that PostgreSQL scales much better. See this page and many other tests which prove over and over again that PostgreSQL scales perfectly.
Khalid
Not really
Mon, 2007/11/26 - 17:34This was not single user. This box has 2 cores, and you can see tests that have concurrency of 5 above.
There are Drupal sites that get 600,000+ page views a day on MySQL MyISAM (not even InnoDB), so MySQL does scale too.
--
2bits -- Drupal and Backdrop CMS consulting
Visitor (not verified)
Apachebench flawed for concurrency?
Fri, 2007/12/14 - 09:20I'm not certain on this, but I've read several times that apachebench is flawed in concurrency tests because it's single-threaded. I haven't tried Flood however.
Pages